| |||
|
Census Records Online |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1794 Petition from Liberty (later Marion) County
I transcribed the following petition from a photocopy of the original
document, sent to me by the SC Deptartment of Archives and History. The copy
is clear, however many of the signatures are difficult to read. In a document
written in one hand, undecipherable letters can be compared with other known
letters, and often become clear that way. Since the original signatures are
shown on this petition, each in a different hand, there is no other writing
in that hand to compare with the unknown letters. I have shown names that are
undecipherable by me in parentheses with a question mark, sometimes showing
other possible interpretations of the name.
As to the petition itself, I have no information regarding this issue. It
would appear to have been somewhat nationwide in scope, given the mention of
Philadelphia. Perhaps someone else can shed some light on the issue of
Medical By-laws and the concern some of our ancestors had about them, as
shown in the petition.
Original spelling retained to the best of my ability.
Jo Church Dickerson
PETITIONS
Reproduced from a document in SC Dept of Archives & History
1794 No. 17
Inhabitants of Liberty Co.
FOLD:
1794
30 April Petition against the Incorporating of the Medical (_?_)
To be considered on the second reading of the Bill.
1794-17-01
To the Honourable the Speaker & House of Represintatives of the
State of South Carolina met in General Assembly-
The petition of the Subscribers Inhabitants of Liberty County in
the sd. State Sheweth
That the incorporation of particular Class or discription of our
Fellow citizens only for the holding property for the benefit of
Charitable Institutions, appears to your Petitioners to be contrary
to principals of a Republican Government, such as we are happily in
the Possession of, That when an exclusive Charter goes so far as to
give an Authority to make Bye Laws whereby others may be affected,
your petitioners concieve that an Exclusive priviledge of that
nature must be unconstitutional, if calculated to deprive any
Citizen whatever of his Liberty or property, which cannot be don
but by the Law of the Land, which a Bye Law cannot be, The
legislative Authority of this State having been deposited { without
any Power as we concieve of subdeligating it with the General
Assembly,
That your petitions have reason to apprehend that such
authority to make Bye Laws may be productive of unjust Combinations
by the infliction of Fines Forfeitures or penalties whenever any
member of Such incorporated Socity should demand & receive less
than what is therein stipulated however unjust or unreasonable,
That your Petitioners have been given to understand that the
practioners or Physic of this State intended to apply for such an
exclusive Privilidge to this Honourable House which your
petitioners beg may be seriously considered of before Granted, And
the applycation
Image file of Page One (24 KB)
(begin page 2)
should be made and be found to be an infringment of
the equal Rights and Priviledges of others, that is maybe totally
disregarded Monopolies are Odious but if they wish for the items of
their Medical Accouts to be santioned by Law, we apprehend that it
cannot be otherwise done than by a Law that is made agreeable to
constitutional principals ~ If they wish to prevent others from
exercising the same profession if done independant of the Controle
of such monopolisers we hope they will meet the disapp(ontmet?)
such conduct appears to be deserving of as much unjustice wrong and
injury might arise from it through prejudice Favouriteism or
antipathy Whereby the Citizens of merit migt be shamefully
oppressed by his (iferiors?) in Science, Knowledge, understanding
experience and Probity. The late dispute in Philadelphia
Between those who are Esteem'd to be their most eminent Physicians
as a striking instance of medical uncertainty, we therefore
conclude that it should be unjust to put it in the Power of one
part of a particular Trade calling or Proffession to oppress the
other part of it for we look upon every such trade Calling or
Proffession to which any Citizen has been b(ind?) to or is capable
of Exercising to be Equal to any freehold Right whatever,
William Davis
John Ervin
(Frans.?) Reaves
Joshua Avant
Jesse Wood
Emm. Cox
John Parmittar
David Hamilton
(Wm.?) Britton
(Banter? or Baxter?)
(Archd.?) Odom
Phil. Bethea
Hugh Giles
Benj. Harralson
Jno. McRee
Exum (Cobb?)
Leonard Dozer
Image file of Page Two (34 KB)
(Begin page 3)
Thos. Rogers
John Rogers
Thomas Crosley
James Munnerlyn
Wm. Rains
Isaac M(cRee?)
Samuel Pitman
Richd. Hughson
Thos. Seabrook
Henry Davis
Gospero Sweet
Absalom Foxworth
John Rice
Robert Rozar
John Foxworth
Valentine Rowell Junr.
Levy Odom
Charles Moody
Uriah Burkett
Benjimin Munnerlyn
Valentine Rowell Senr.
Isom Coward
Robt. Frazer
Robt. Hodges
Zachariah Godbolt
(Saml.?) -Blount- Edwards (Blount struck through or smeared)
Wm. Whitfield
Elisha (Reaves? Owens? Oates?)
Jacob Blackwell
James Gregg
Henry L. (McNeill? Mcall? Hill???)
John Ford
Shadrach Rogers
Allen Leget
Thomas Page
Jesse Page
Wilis (or Miles?) McDaniel
(Sylas?) (Heart???)
William (Shac---? or Frac---?)
John Godbolt
Loveless Gasque
Francis Boatwright
Joseph (Morris? Manness?)
William Phillips
Shadrach Rice
Jesse Wiggans
William Caps
David Palmer
John Lands Thomas
Jacob Rowell
Thomas Boatwright
James Keen
John (Guines? Ownes?)
Thomas Hux
Elishua Owens
Lewis Boatwright
Thomas Jenkins
Image file of Page Three (26 KB)
(begin page 4)
D. Rowell
David Murrie
Reuben Heartsfield
R. Godfrey
William Lewis
Wm. Bellune
Right Wall
David Davis
Eligh Owens (very shakey hand)
John Hux
James Brown
Abraham Dew
William Baker
Gavin Witherspoon
Image file of Page Four (22 KB)
Back to Marion County Homepage Copyright © 1996-2004 Victoria Proctor. All rights reserved. |